The site was identified as important in 2002 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species'):Species | Current IUCN Red List Category | Season | Year(s) | Population estimate at site | IBA criteria met |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Black-faced Spoonbill Platalea minor | EN | winter | 1995-2000 | 12-23 individuals | A1, A4i |
Chinese Egret Egretta eulophotes | VU | passage | 1996 | 1 individuals | A1 |
Spoon-billed Sandpiper Calidris pygmaea | CR | winter | 2001 | 1 individuals | A1 |
Saunders's Gull Saundersilarus saundersi | VU | winter | 1995-2001 | 77-147 individuals | A1, A4i |
The current IUCN Red List category may differ from that which was valid at the time of IBA criteria assessment (2002).
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment (most recent) | State (condition) | Pressure (threat) | Response (action) |
2008 | unfavourable | high | negligible |
Was the whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
no | habitat | - |
State (condition of the trigger species' habitats) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Habitat | Habitat detail | Reference area (ha) | Actual area (ha) | Habitat quantity (% remaining) | Habitat quality (carrying capacity) | Result |
Forest | 13696 | 6255 | - | - | unfavourable |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Threat level 1 | Threat level 2 | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Agricultural expansion and intensification | marine and freshwater aquaculture - industrial aquaculture | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
Biological resource use | fishing & harvesting aquatic resources - unintentional effects: large scale | happening now | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
Biological resource use | hunting & collecting terrestrial animals - unintentional effects (species is not the target) | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected-area designation | Management planning | Other conservation action | Result |
Little/none of site covered (<10%) | No management planning has taken place | Very little or no conservation action taking place | negligible |
Protected area (PA) | PA designation | PA area (ha) | Relationship of PA with IBA | Overlap of PA with IBA (ha) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Red River Delta | UNESCO-MAB Biosphere Reserve | 105,557 | protected area overlaps with site | 0 |
Habitat (IUCN level 1) | Habitat detail | Extent (% of site) |
---|---|---|
Artificial/Aquatic & Marine | Other artificial wetlands | - |
Forest | Mangrove forest (tropical) | - |
Marine Neritic | - | |
Marine Intertidal | - |
Land-use | Extent (% of site) |
---|---|
fisheries/aquaculture | - |
unknown | - |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2023) Important Bird Area factsheet: Thai Thuy. Downloaded from
http://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/thai-thuy-iba-vietnam on 07/12/2023.